Minnesota’s February Forecast – federal stimulus clouds the situation

March 3, 2009

The numbers are out…but the federal stimulus dollars are clouding the seriousness of the situation.

The state budget deficit is projected to grow to $6.4 billion for FY 2010-11, or about 17% of the state general fund budget. This is up from the $4.8 billion predicted in the November Forecast and is right in line with the kind of bad news people have been expecting.

However, the headlines are focusing on a rosier number – $4.6 billion. What accounts for the difference? The lower number includes the impact of some federal stimulus dollars. Specifically, $1.8 billion in Medicaid matching funds (although $460 million of these matching funds come in FY 2009). The largest chunk of money coming to the state from the federal government is in the form of an increase in the federal matching rate on Medicaid spending. Normally Minnesota pays 50% of Medicaid costs and the federal government matches at 50%. Under the federal stimulus plan, the federal matching rate rises closer to 60%, allowing Minnesota’s share to fall to about 40%. These federal dollars are included in the forecast because the state already has the statutory authority it needs to accept Medicaid funds. However, in order for the state to draw down the full $1.8 billion, we cannot make any changes in eligibility to Medicaid programs. This restriction will force the Governor to make some significant revisions to his proposed cuts in health care.

There are other federal stimulus dollars the state is likely to receive, but does not yet have the statutory authority to accept, so they aren’t included in the forecast. The biggest chunk of unrealized federal funds: about $800 million in state stabilization funds, most of which must be spent in K-12 or higher education.

What the $1.8 billion in federal Medicaid funds may hide, however, is the seriousness of the state’s current economic circumstances. State Economist Tom Stinson warns that this is likely to be the longest and deepest recession since World War II. Before it’s over, Minnesota is expected to lose 120,000 jobs – 50,000 of them are already gone. And this prediction assumes positive effects from the federal stimulus legislation.

Don’t get me wrong, the federal stimulus dollars are helpful and welcome, but they are just a one-time solution. And the Governor’s budget proposal already includes about $2.3 billion in one-time solutions for solving the deficit – including selling bonds and shifting state education payments.  Adding these three pieces together means that more than 60% of the budget solution could end up being just a one-time fix.

Unfortunately, our budget troubles don’t end in FY 2011. In fact, the projected deficit for FY 2012-13 has grown to $5.1 billion, or $6.5 billion if we include the impact of inflation.  These numbers are more for planning purposes, but they do indicate that there is no quick answer to Minnesota’s economic challenges.

The situation is serious – we shouldn’t let the influx of federal resources hide the fact that Minnesota has a long-term problem. That means we need to have all the potential budget-balancing tools on the table – including solutions that will have a long-term impact on reducing our deficits - like raising revenues.

Be sure to visit the Minnesota Management and Budget website to download a copy of the February Forecast or to look at the very useful PowerPoint presentation from the press conference. You can also check out the Minnesota Budget Project’s press release on the forecast.

-Christina Wessel


February Forecast expected March 3, and more economic news

January 15, 2009

Dr. Tom Stinson, Minnesota’s state economist, told the Senate Finance Committee this morning that the release of the February Forecast has been pushed back to Tuesday, March 3 to capture the most current economic information. Also, the forecast will not include any direct payments the state would receive from a federal economic stimulus package unless that package is passed into law prior to the release of the forecast.

There are a couple of other important points Dr. Stinson has been highlighting in recent talks that underscore how very cautious policymakers must be as they work to solve the budget deficit (check out Katherine’s blog on Dr. Stinson’s presentation at a Minnesota Budget Project event earlier this week):

  • Back in November, the forecast predicted a 1.0 percent decline in real GDP in 2009. There was also a more pessimistic scenario that predicted a 2.4 percent decline…that scenario was nick-named “meltdown.” Well, the recently released January Economic Update now predicts a 2.5 percent decline in Real GDP. Meltdown.
  • The January Economic Update shows that state revenues for November and December came in below forecast projections – even though our expectations were significantly ratcheted down in the November Forecast. We will see the impact of these lower revenues on the size of our deficit when the February Forecast is released.
  • Capital gains is an area to watch carefully. I blogged on this back in December, but it’s worth reiterating. Our state forecast predicts a 30 percent decline in capital gains…but the Congressional Budget Office is predicting 40 percent and other states are predicting 50 percent. If our forecast is wrong, we could see a sudden deficit of $200-300 million that would need to be resolved by June 30. Unfortunately, we won’t find out if we are wrong until May.

The lesson: we should expect a February Forecast that predicts higher budget deficits and we must keep money in our budget reserves to cover the possibility of additional deficits before the end of the biennium.

The good news: we are not facing another Great Depression, Dr. Stinson assures us. Back then, it took until 1940 for us to get back to the same level of economic output we were experiencing in 1929. While we are probably in the midst of the worst recession since World War II, this isn’t a depression.

-Christina Wessel


State economist warns of larger deficit in February Forecast

February 5, 2008

The bearer of bad newsLast week, the Minnesota Budget Project held a briefing with State Economist Tom Stinson. His comments earned a lot of press coverage, especially when he said that the February Forecast will show a larger deficit than the $373 million measured in November. The only question is how much larger. He was unwilling to make a guess, but we’ll all know when the February Forecast comes out, mostly likely on February 28.

Dr. Stinson was asked a question about what governments can do to stimulate the economy. In the last few weeks there has been a lively debate about what action the federal government can take to keep the economy from sliding into recession or to lessen the pain from an economic downturn. Dr. Stinson noted that many have described effective stimulus measures as timely, targeted and temporary. (The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has a nice issue brief about these principles.) He said that policies along these lines include extended unemployment insurance benefits.

These comments were pretty consistent with what the Minnesota Budget Project has arguing for in the federal stimulus debate, which was described more fully in an action alert and press statement that was handed out at the briefing. The U.S. Senate will be taking a vote this week on their stimulus package.

-Nan Madden