<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House tax proposal focuses on balance in the tax system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/2009/04/21/house-tax-proposal-focuses-on-balance-in-the-tax-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/2009/04/21/house-tax-proposal-focuses-on-balance-in-the-tax-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/2009/04/21/house-tax-proposal-focuses-on-balance-in-the-tax-system/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/?p=1844#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I had another thought here.  Let&#039;s consider the use of &quot;faith based&quot; organizations by government - that is, a recognition that services need to be provide but the government doesn&#039;t want to be in that business.  If we think of taxes in the same way - ways to fund services that need to be provided - then whatever is done for deducting taxes should be done for charitable giving to organizations that provide [those] services.  I think this might cut out some of the non-profits from the eligible mix (example here might be the Arboretum).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had another thought here.  Let&#8217;s consider the use of &#8220;faith based&#8221; organizations by government &#8211; that is, a recognition that services need to be provide but the government doesn&#8217;t want to be in that business.  If we think of taxes in the same way &#8211; ways to fund services that need to be provided &#8211; then whatever is done for deducting taxes should be done for charitable giving to organizations that provide [those] services.  I think this might cut out some of the non-profits from the eligible mix (example here might be the Arboretum).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/2009/04/21/house-tax-proposal-focuses-on-balance-in-the-tax-system/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotabudgetbites.org/?p=1844#comment-240</guid>
		<description>While the charitable giving is a considerable percent of my itemized deductions, I&#039;d like to believe the reason I give is because it is the right thing to do.  Charitable giving is a form of &quot;social justice&quot; and &quot;stewardship&quot;, that is, people give their &quot;riches&quot; (money, goods, time, etc.) to those that are disadvantaged or to organizations that serve the disadvantaged (e.g., church, PROP, etc.). The tax advantage certainly makes giving less painful, but it&#039;s probably not the reason most folks donate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the charitable giving is a considerable percent of my itemized deductions, I&#8217;d like to believe the reason I give is because it is the right thing to do.  Charitable giving is a form of &#8220;social justice&#8221; and &#8220;stewardship&#8221;, that is, people give their &#8220;riches&#8221; (money, goods, time, etc.) to those that are disadvantaged or to organizations that serve the disadvantaged (e.g., church, PROP, etc.). The tax advantage certainly makes giving less painful, but it&#8217;s probably not the reason most folks donate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

